Deerhurst

This past weekend was spent at the Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville, Ontario. Two hours north of Toronto, the town is just starting to see spring - buds just beginning to emerge on trees, though some spring flowers are in bloom.

On Friday evening, in the midst of a severe thunderstorm, I took the camera onto the Pavilion Terrace overlooking Sunset Bay, and Peninsula Lake just beyond. I stood underneath a sheltered area and took a few photos, and while the camera managed to capture the night scenery, I wish I’d had my videocamera to capture the sound of the rain and the thunder and lightning in the distance.

No camera, though, is able to capture the overwhelming scent of cedar only concentrated by the rain. I was the only person who was outside on such a night taking photographs, but I could have stayed on the terrace much longer had I not needed to be elsewhere.

If you’ve ever seen the 1987 film, “Dirty Dancing,” standing outside at Deerhurst Friday night reminded me of the Catskills resort featured in the film. (One half expected to see Johnny and Baby!)

A tiring three days, but of course we did manage to get through with the help of wine in the evenings and Shelley’s chocolate mint martinis mid-afternoon.

And youth counsellors and EpiPens will never be looked upon the same way again…

Pic of the Day


I took this shot about three or four years ago at the Zooma Zooma Café in Jordan Village.  A patron next to us had just left this particular table, so looking rather odd, I’m sure, to other patrons, I quickly snapped this photo.  I converted it to black and white to give it more street-like character.

Dreams of a Diaper-Diva.

As if Toronto isn’t beleaguered enough, rumour has it that George Smitherman is hinting of his desire to be the city’s next titular head. (This is the same gent who just recently suggested he don adult diapers to appreciate fully the plight of seniors in nursing homes who are left for extended periods of time in soiled undergarments.)

After reading The Star article here, I have to say that I have little time for grown men who can only hint and whisper amongst themselves of their latent desires to claw their way to the top of the political heap. Covert planning and all hush-hush, I’m convinced these sorts thrive on a bit of James Bond and Moneypenny gamesmanship.

So, dangling the supposedly coveted carrot in plain view, are the rest of us thought to be so naive that we can’t peg a wolf dressed in sheep’s clothing?

For Chrissakes, George, if you want to be captain of the team, king of the hill, the big kahuna, just say it for cryin’ out loud! I don’t think there’s a whole lot of us who are enamoured with a man who speaks softly of his desires (at least outside of the bedroom…) to his cronies at ‘gala’ events.

On the other hand, being politics an’ all, what better way to get the word around than by murmuring surreptitiously into another’s ear a political secret, knowing it will spread faster than a California wildfire in August? They used to say loose lips sink ships, but Georgie’s just working the room, glad-handing, a few slaps on the back, paving his way on the yellow brick road to City Hall.

The tin-man cometh.

If you read the Star article, don’t miss Smitherman’s well-choreographed and unctuous admiration of his boss, Dalton McGuinty, who, allegedly, “unlocked one of the greatest secrets, one of the greatest pieces of magic of Toronto, which is to be found in her ravines.”

Huh?

Ravines! Dalton says one of the greatest pieces of magic of Toronto is….

One can’t help but wonder if this is what David Miller has overlooked all these years. Hey, Dave, the answers to Toronto’s ills are, according to Dalton, in the ravines. And all this time - since the ice age, in fact - who would have known?

Can you believe this clap-trap? How gullible do these clowns think we are?

Is there an elected public servant out there who is immune to this political logorrhea, to the draw of the media, to the spilling of secrets? If you ask me, it’s all too reminiscent of a sixth grade election for class president, or pretty much on par with Hillary and Barack’s infinite sniping just south of the border.

In our case, it ought to make for one interesting mayoral race in 2010.

Resurrecting Bruce

In progress.

Ramblings of a madman

This morning I read the article linked here in today’s issue of The Toronto Star, a story about Robert Baltovich being found not-guilty in the murder of Elizabeth Bain.

What really struck me, however, was the transcript of the police questioning Paul Bernardo. Bernardo, as you will see, is incapable of lucid or coherent answers, preferring instead to speak in fillers that take the long way around, leading up to a climax of… nothing.

I found it unnerving just reading the words.

Even though Bernardo killed Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy in the early 1990s, they still come to mind each time I drive past the church on Linwell Road where Kristen French was abducted. I pass the church at least six times a week and never fail to think of Bernardo and Homolka pushing Kristen into their car. I feel the same sickening feeling every time, thinking of the high school teenager not far from her home or school further along the north-end street, and the same thought comes to mind: how could the abduction of Kristen French have gone unnoticed on a busy thoroughfare in broad daylight?

CONVERSATION WITH A KILLER

On June 7, 2007, police interviewed Paul Bernardo at Kingston Penitentiary and asked him about Elizabeth Bain. Here is a transcript:

Police: Um, did you kill Elizabeth Bain on June 19, 1990?

Bernardo: Well that’s a loaded question. I mean, are we going to go back and go through the time sequence of what happened in my life. I mean I could just give a yes or no answer. But you know, there are a lot of issues about that.

Police: Right.

Bernardo: You know, Karla’s and my role. Who did what, when, why – you guys, you know, go down there to get a polygraph to get to see if she’s telling the truth. Why didn’t they do it in the first place? … why would he make a deal with someone and not give them a polygraph? It’s incomprehensible. You know, because … my file says her version and it’s a lie. … I’m not making frivolous points here. And now, you’re asking me, after Peel Regional says I’m lying about this and now you’re saying I’m lying about my profile. … and now you’re saying hey, did you kill this person? I mean if you’re saying I’m lying here, here and here. I could say no, I didn’t, but, I mean you already said I’m lying here with the Peel. You say …

Police: I’m not saying anything about who’s lying. I’m simply …

Bernardo: And I’ve given you directions to go to find the truth and no one has done that.

Police: Right. And again I’ve told you that I’ve done the investigation from what information you’ve told me and … I’ve been able to verify in my mind where you’ve told me the truth. So if Peel Region is lying about you or someone else is lying about you, I have no control over that or (inaudible).

Bernardo: It goes right to credibility.

Police: Well, absolutely. … I hope to be able to go through some timelines here and identify where you were, what you were doing specifically in relation to this case.

Bernardo: Anyways, I know I’m giving you guys a hard time but I mean really. I’m a human being. When you guys do all these things, I’ve gotta. I’ll try to give you a little bit more but. Anyways the answer to that is no. But the 800-pound gorilla in a room – that’s life-25 sentence, you know. It really comes down to credibility.

Police: Right.

Bernardo: And not only credibility but then again timelines, what Karla’s and my roles were respectively and this and that – the answer is no to that question.

Police: Did you have anything to do with her disappearance?

Bernardo: No.

Police: Did you know Elizabeth Bain?

Bernardo: Not that I know of.

Police: Had you ever met her?

Bernardo: I’m going to answer that one with I don’t remember. Because if I did, I don’t remember. I know an ex-girlfriend, which I can think – but I don’t know.

Another attempt to save Ally Pally

It’s not often one can say they played at a palace when they were growing up, but that’s just what we did.

The pictures below are of Alexandra Palace, where I spent many hours way back when. The Grove - the wooded area that is part of the grounds - was directly across the street from our home, and adjacent to our school. The Grove led through to the Palace, the boating pond, and in those days (the 1960s) a children’s railway that circled the pond. (The pond is visible to the top right of the aerial photo below.) Of all the things to do in London, going on the boats and riding that railway were my favourite pastimes. The palace also introduced roller skating on Saturdays, so our weekends - along with the children’s matinées at the Odeon cinema on Fortis Green Road - were covered.

Playtime, as we called it then, was idyllic.

A year-and-a-half ago, Tanya and I walked through the Grove and around the palace grounds. We stood on the edge of the boating pond after 37 years and could only see remnants of what we remembered. It was a rather dismal, overcast day and we would point to different areas and say, “That used to be….”

The railway was gone, the boat sheds were gone, and there were no children’s boats out on the pond - at least that day. There was, however, a modern and colourful playground, as generic as any other.

The view from the palace is astonishing. Standing on the terrace offers a remarkable viewpoint to see for miles and miles across London, most of the city’s landmarks visible to the naked eye. It’s something I never paid much attention to in 1968!

As for the Grove, it wasn’t quite as lush and expansive as I remembered, and I shook my head at the thought we 8, 9, and 10 year-olds used to play there by ourselves with no adult supervision. Perhaps it was another era, but it was still the City of London in the turbulent 1960s. That week in London more recently, I never did see any children playing alone in the Grove, only a few adults walking dogs or an au pair pushing a pram.

Times had changed.

Here’s the article that describes Mayor Ken Livingstone’s proposal…

From the Muswell Hill Journal, April 16, 2008

LONDON Mayor Ken Livingstone has said he would be “happy” to take beleaguered Alexandra Palace off Haringey Council’s hands - IF he gets re-elected on May 1.

Mr Livingstone exclusively told the Journal that he had offered to take over the running of the Palace from Haringey Council during a brief visit to Muswell Hill last week.

Ken Livingstone: Palace is a huge burden on one borough
His remarks mean there could again be a three-way fisght for the Palace - not promised since a tender for its 125-year lease was offered in 2005.

The Greater London Authority could go head-to-head with millionaire entrepreneur Firoz Kassam, whose company Firoka has spent the last two-and-a-half years trying to thrash out a highly controversial deal with the council for the Palace lease.

The Save Ally Pally campaign group is also in on the bout, having recently unveiled its own bold plans to run both Park and Palace using a new Board of Trustees and investment from several quarters.

Speaking during a pre-election walkabout in Muswell Hill Broadway last Thursday, Mr Livingstone said: “I have said to the council if they want to give up Alexandra Palace, we will take it over. It is a huge burden on one borough. We have taken over Crystal Palace and we would be happy to do the same for Haringey Council.”

Turning to Councillor George Meehan, leader of Haringey Council, who was listening to the conversation, Mr Livingstone said: “If you want to give it to us we will take it over.” He said the Palace was “an impossible burden for a local authority to bear, but it is manageable for the GLA”.

A gleeful Councillor Meehan later told the Journal: “If the Mayor’s offers are serious and he wants to take over the Palace, and he wins the election, I will ring him on May 6 and say, ‘Ken, when can we talk?’

“It would be a great location for a hotel I think, and a restaurant. You can imagine sitting there having a meal and looking right out across London.”

The Save Ally Pally campaign has proposed establishing the People’s Palace Trust in which Wood Green-based Mountview Theatre School could pump £7million into a restoration project.

SAP’s Jacob O’Callaghan said: “I find Ken’s proposal very interesting, and I will be conferring with colleagues about it. We will be trying to talk to both Ken and Boris ourselves soon.”

Although Mr Livingstone did not expand on how he planned to rescue the Palace, he already has experience of taking on large, complex projects, namely Crystal Palace Park.

Mr Livingstone and the London Development Agency took on the south London park’s National Sports Centre as part of its London 2012 Olympics bid, and this year the LDA submitted a masterplan for the entire Park, which unlike its Muswell Hill twin no longer has a Palace.

The 11,000-page masterplan could contain pointers to Mr Livingstone and the LDA’s ideas for Alexandra Palace. Building a cricket pavilion, reinstating the boating lake and building a dinosaur-themed education centre were generally well-received ideas, but most controversially it includes plans to sell off part of the Park for private housing to help balance the books.

This led to residents gathering a 7,000-signature petition in protest - “scarcely acknowledged” by the Mayor, according to John Payne, chairman of the Crystal Palace Community Association.

He said: “Nothing the public has said has made any difference to the masterplan. The consultations have been a sham from day one. His view that selling off parkland for housing, an ‘ends justify the means’ approach, is in our view totally flawed.” The plan is currently being considered by Bromley Council.

FIROZ Kassam’s company Firoka retains the upper hand in the battle for control of Alexandra Palace, as it has a contract in place with Haringey Council.

It is still working with the Palace’s current Trustees on details of a 125-year lease of the Palace, despite being forced to vacate its offices on the site after the High Court ruled last October that the public consultation on the lease was fatally flawed.

The Save Ally Pally campaign claims the current Trustees have lost well over £3million in income due to Firoka’s occupation.

Firoka has not discussed its £55million regeneration proposals for the building since 2006, which then specified a casino - now off the cards - cinema, restored theatre, new ice rink, hotel, office and conference space, gym, restaurant, museum, nightclub, market, recording studio, bowling alley and crèche.

The People’s Palace Trust, proposed by the Save Ally Pally campaign group and outlined at the charity’s last advisory committee meeting, would be a new board of Trustees, democratically elected by Londoners. SAP claims lots of groups are willing to get involved and offer investment, but had “not been encouraged to come forward by the current Trustees”.

The plan is to refurbish the Palace, including the Willis Organ, in a piecemeal fashion, building an “Olympic standard” ice rink and improving the exhibition business.

PPT would raise vital cash from various groups in return for use of space - £7million had been offered by Mountview Theatre School in Wood Green to refurbish the Victorian theatre and use it as a base, and £10million from hotelier Malmaison to set up in the building, for example.

Commercial rents would subsidise peppercorn rents paid by community and charitable interests in other areas of the Palace, fulfilling the PPT’s charitable obligations. SAP’s Martin Hay even says the PPT could bring the entire Palace back into use ahead of Firoka. A separate contractor could be paid to manage the Park itself, he suggested, adding: “This is a tried and tested method and it works.

Afternoon in April

Spring!

A sunny Saturday afternoon in the garden and I managed to capture this insect on the daffodils.

This was shot with the Nikkor 18-200mm VR lens, but I would love to have captured this photograph with a macro lens. I imagine the difference would be incredible.


Kim Robinson, the Duke, and all the rest of ‘em

There is major, ongoing, road construction nearby, which I can’t seem to avoid after taking Steph to school and then driving to Port first thing in the morning. Today, I sat there waiting for the sign to turn from Stop to Slow, listening to the news of Kim Robinson - Canada’s answer to the Duke - and held out hope that ‘real men’ might just be making a comeback.

The DukeAs my car idled in this lane of construction traffic, off to my right was a tall, robust looking dude in red t-shirt, dust-covered Levis, steel-toed boots and battered hard-hat, swigging back coffee out of a dented stainless flask. He stood with another man and they talked for a bit, before one slapped the other on the back, grabbed a reflective, yellow safety vest and headed towards the drone of cement mixers and jackhammers.

Shortly before, I had passed the local Starbucks, where I saw the dappers (men who might be referred to as ‘metrosexuals’) coming and going like a revolving door, dressed in impeccably tailored suits and pointed, kill-a-cockroach-in-a-corner shoes. They sauntered out of their chic cafe, heads cocked to the wind for fear of getting the gelled and spiked ‘do mussed up, clutching their stylish cups in one hand and their Blackberries in the other.

Anyone would think they were on their way to a wine and food pairing seminar.

With a mere two lanes of traffic separating these near-colliding worlds, the polarity between the coffee joint and the construction zone was nothing short of striking,

Pic o’ the Day

Stormy Lake Penage

I’ve not been paying much attention to this blog the last few days, because of illness. So, instead of writing, here are two shots of far different days at our island up north two years ago.

This one to the left shows the bay at the front of our cottage (we were inside!) during a really awful storm. You can see how gray the sky is, though there must have been a lull in the action because the Ensign is in full droop(!) mode, or else I snapped this at precisely the calmest moment.

What we didn’t know at the time was that a small tornado was touching down in nearby Espanola, and that considerable damage had been done to our neighbour’s island further down the lake. The green tone in this shot, and I don’t mean the obvious tones to the right, but rather the gray/green to the left, reminded me at the time of the colour I saw immediately before another tornado touched down in Sudbury in 1970 which wreaked havoc across the Nickel Belt and left me terrified of storms for months afterward.

This other shot, however, was on a much different day when Roger and I were out for an afternoon boat ride. (That would be my Woody’s…)

After being sick this week, both of these shots - even the stormy one - remind me that summer at the cottage is not too far away.

“And we pay to do this!”

With tongue in cheek, the words in the post’s title become a familiar refrain this time of year, because dance competition season has officially arrived.

Just like a school year, the dance year has its own calendar. September through December is all about new schedules, getting back into shape, refining technique, and beginning the season’s competitive choreography. Just before music choices are decided upon, there comes the inevitable mixing and cutting at the computer to suit the number and to satisfy the competition’s time limits. Large groups, small groups, lines, trios, duets, solos and the requisite production are planned, choreography timetables adjusted, and every so often a flip through the dance-wear catalogues for costume ideas.

With all of this neatly behind us, yesterday saw day one of competition number one.

Luckily - at least that’s how I see it - we were local, and at a venue that I’ve always enjoyed, purely for its accessibility and the fact we’ve competed at various competitions there over the years. The younger ones normally start off most competitions, cute four, five, and six-year-olds, dressed impeccably by mothers whose emotions range from nervous excitability to overwhelming pride. Their official initiation into competition, they stand together, coffees in hand, wearing team jackets with emblazoned studio names, and pins that might say, “Dance Mom,” or some other slogan that identifies them as part of a team.

I never did wear a ‘dance mom’ pin, but I was indeed one of those that stood those first couple of years excited, yet semi-terrified, at seeing my daughter and her group perform on stage. I honestly had no idea what to expect, but there she was, strategically placed with the rest of her group, in a bouncy, pink-sequin and crinoline skirt, matching bodysuit, her ponytail a flourish of tight, blonde curls, pink bow atop her head, and sporting beige, Cuban-heel tap shoes.

If truth be told, they all looked like they’d just shuffled and time-stepped their way out of a Shirley Temple film. Looking back, it was, without question, our bona fide, ceremonial initiation, our six little girls, identically dressed, practised and ready to perform to win pins, ribbons, and if the gods were good, a trophy.

Unfortunately, nobody told us the trophies were 100%, honest-to-goodness plastic, and never mind their shamefully fake, sprayed-on gold sheen and minuscule marble plaques, these were coveted badges of honour, and damn it, we wanted ‘em. We novices were unabashedly in awe of those tall, pillared, Empire State-looking structures that needed a couple of dancers just to haul them off stage.

Now that’s what we called a trophy!

In the early years the kids would tote along mascots - large, stuffed animals covered in pins and ribbons and special awards won at previous competitions. Stephanie was given one of these by one of the senior dancers, a toy almost half her size, but she lugged it with her, on-stage for every adjudication.

Today, it’s different. The stuffed animal has long been packed away, the tightly-curled ponytails have disappeared, fluorescent crinoline skirts given away, and she hasn’t danced in Cuban-heeled tap shoes since the cows came home.

Now she is collected from high school by a teammate and they drive together to the competition early afternoon to support the younger ones. And that’s another thing, even the cheers have evolved over the years. These days they sound more like howls, sounds that only teenagers, I swear, are able to generate from their throats, but still, they’re mixed in with loud clapping, the calling of dancers’ names, the wolf-whistles… you get the picture.

As I arrived at the venue yesterday afternoon, my daughter was applying eye make-up to an eight-year-old at this, the little girl’s first competition. I recalled applying stage make-up to Stephanie at the same age, ahead of time and at home, years ago, when I’d have cartoons playing on TV so that she’d sit still long enough for me to attempt a form of face painting that any sensible parent would deem frighteningly garish. Ah yes, up close, perhaps, but from the audience she would look good - you’ll see, we promise… and so I was led to believe.

“Really,” they said. “It’ll look good. Trust us.”

It was half-true, though I might have believed them completely had I some training over and above the studio lesson given by one of the senior girls in the large studio filled with almost 100 other girls, mothers, aunts, and sisters. We were told to come prepared to learn: make-up kit, eyelashes, glue, all of the necessary paraphernalia… they would provide the diagrams.

Diagrams??? What the….

The rules of make-up application were strict, and strictly-adhered to, sadistic twists on time-honoured themes of colouring inside the lines. This was no elementary paint-by-numbers I can tell you. I broke out in a cold sweat, and all the swearing was done under my breath.

What in hell had I got myself into?

Then came the false eyelashes for which we certainly weren’t prepared - I’d never even held them before. The creepy, glued-on, #105s, these spider-like hairs were a nightmare to stick on anyone’s eyelids, let alone a squirming seven-year-old. Not enough glue, too much glue, try this, try that, freakin’ (no pun intended) things that could pass as dead insects. As any dance mother knows, one’s first foray into this glue-n-stick (please, God, let them stick this time, and I promise I’ll never lose my temper again) ritual can bring tears of frustration to even the most hardened of dance moms among us.

Fast-forward to present day… now my sixteen-year-old, like all in her group, expertly applies her own makeup and lashes, rivalling the talents of any Hollywood artiste, in my opinion. Her hair is sleek after the repeated clamping of a straightening iron, pulled back into what we refer to as a nape of the neck, low pony, and clasped with an elegant rhinestoned pin. The senior girls have paid their dues; they all know how to look good for on-stage performances for adjudicators and audiences alike.

Friday afternoon the entire team performed the production number. Beforehand, there may have been chaos in the change room - someone forgot this, someone forgot that - but as they come out on stage, these children (and legally, they are) become, for three minutes, other beings. Gone are the squabbles and heated words with mothers, and their hormone-induced, pre-teen, and teen, mood flashes have all since disappeared… hell, these are dancers, pros, wonderfully sophisticated beings - but set your stopwatch, they’ll come off stage either laughing or ranting, and with any luck, it’ll be the former.

Their ages range from about eight-years to eighteen-years-old. I looked at my daughter and the other senior dancers and thought how adept they all are at performing, their technique undeniably polished. I thought the same of our intermediate group, most of whom I’ve watched since they were four and five-year-olds, some now entering high-school. The little ones, entering their second year with just one competitive season under their belts have also changed, refinement evident already.

With almost ten years of competitions behind me, I can, like any seasoned dance parent, identify what’s good and what’s not so good, predicting quickly and fairly accurately the final outcome. One can see right away ‘who’s off’ and ‘who’s really on,’ who has good expression, those great stage-faces, as we say.

For about three minutes we watch, smile, laugh, gasp, cheer and clap for the kids. There will always be a prop that fails, or is dropped, hairpieces that fly, screws that come loose from taps, and other various and sundry ‘wardrobe malfunctions,’ but in the end I remind myself that these are kids, after all.

Sitting in the theatre yesterday, it all came back… the now-funny recollections of years gone by, the “do you remember when…” stories, the fabled wins and losses, the justly-won right up there with the questionable adjudications, away-competitions and the “joys” of overnight stays in hotels with lots of kids, and adults imbibing after a long day behind them… all the memories of the past. I looked at a friend yesterday and said for the first time this season, “How many numbers ’til we’re up?” and realized that it’s all begun yet again.